Posted on

Styles of Management

The Management Pocketbooks Pocket Correspondence Course

This is part of an extended management course. You can dip into it, or follow the course from the start. If you do that, you may want a course notebook, for the exercises and any notes you want to make.


In the ‘good old days’ – good old days for managers, that is – there was one style of management:

Tell them what to do – expect them to do it – punish them if they don’t

Life must have been easy then for managers: no need to motivate people (more on that in coming weeks), no back chat and alternative ideas from staff, no worry about giving offence, and high levels of compliance.

Scientific Management

On the other hand, how efficient were workers then? Frederick Winslow Taylor wanted to apply the principles of science to management and was the first person to try to analyse an organisation, test his ideas with experiments, and document the results.

‘Taylorism’ treated people as cogs in a machine. Optimise all aspects of the process, including people, to get the best results. So Taylor introduced time and motion studies to optimise how workers did things, and piece rates as incentives for workers. He said ‘do it this way and you will get your reward’. This was scientific management.

Humanistic Management

Scientific Management largely failed. Yes, it led to the hugely successful production line and arguably to just-in-time concepts too. Six Sigma, TQM and Lean can all draw their origins from scientific management too.

But it failed as regards people. Elton Mayo was a follower of Taylor and tried to apply Taylorist principle in the Hawthorne Lighting Plant. He discovered that changing light levels changed work rates. But it didn’t matter how you changed the light levels, as long as you engaged the workers in the process. What mattered was engaging people. It still does – that’s why staff engagement is such a big deal.

Theory X or Theory Y

The tension between task focus and people focus was crystallised by Douglas McGregor in his models of management style called Theory X (task, transaction, process, incentive focused) and Theory Y (people, consensus, motivation, satisfaction focused).

These are reflected in two contrasting styles of day-to-day management: Management by Objectives (MBO) and Management by Walking About (MWA).

MBO is all about setting clear objectives to staff and supporting them in achieving them – it is formal, transactional and has been seen as highly successful. For example, Bill Packard attributed the success of Hewlett Packard in its heyday to MBO.

But strangely, Bill Packard was well known for wandering around all areas of his business, chatting with people, building relationships, sharing ideas and offering inspiration.

Balance

There is no ‘right’ style of management. We each need to find the right balance, that works for us. We also need to adapt that balance to each individual and to changing circumstances.

Balance of Management Styles

Further Reading 

You may also like the Pockeblog articleIt’s time to get enabling

Three Six Sigma Articles

  1. Belt up and Reduce Errors
  2. The DMAIC Solution Process
  3. Six Tools from Six Sigma
Share this:
Posted on

12 Blogs for Christmas

Holly&Ivy

This has been a great year for the Pocketblog, seeing reading figures rise substantially and reaching the milestone of our 100th blog posting.

So, with Christmas coming at the end of the week, let’s do a round-up of some personal favourites from among this year’s Pocketblogs.

Here is something for each of the twelve days.  Enjoy!

1. Start as you mean to go on: Happiness

After some New Year’s Resolutions to start the year off, we dived into the subject of Happiness, with ‘Happiness – as simple as ABC?’ about Albert Ellis’s Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy – the fore-runner of CBT.

2. … and Start Topical

We then moved into a subject that was much in the news in February; and still is.  With ‘Bankers’ Bonuses and Brain Biology’, we looked at recent neuroscience and how that relates to Adams’ Equity Theory.

3. Generations

In February too, I wrote two blogs about sociological ‘Generations X, Y & Z’ and ‘Generation Y at work’.  I followed this up by another about what comes ‘After Generation Y?’.

4. The Gemba

In May, inspiration waned for a week, so where did I go to find it?  ‘The Gemba’.  I got it back, and later that month, got idealistic in ‘Reciprocity and Expectation’ looking at the Pay it Forward ideal and the realities of Game Theory.

5. Why do we do what we do?

In the first of two blogs on how to predict human behaviour, I looked at ‘How to Understand your Toddler’ (mine actually) and Icek Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behaviour.  Later in the year, in ‘Predicting Behaviour’, I looked at whether a simple equation (hypothesised by Kurt Lewin) could predict all behaviour.

6. One of the Best Business Books of the Year

… according to the Journal Strategy & Business is Richard Rumelt’s Good Strategy/Bad Strategy: The difference and why it matters.  In ‘What Makes a Good Business Strategy’ we looked at some of his ideas.

7. The Apprentice

This year, I have been a big fan of both series and have written my own episode by episode analysis of both The Apprentice and Young Apprentice.  I also did one blog on each for Pocketblog: ‘The Apprentice and Five Levels of Leadership’ and, for Young Apprentice, ‘Decision Failure’.

8. Drucker Triptych

Has any one individual been as influential in establishing management as a pragmatic academic discipline as Peter Drucker?  To recognise his various achievements, I wrote a triptych of blogs over the summer:

  1. The Man who Invented Management
  2. Management by Objectives
  3. R.I.P. Corporate Clone: Arise Insightful Executive

And one of Drucker’s direct contemporaries was W Edwards Deming, so I also took a look at ‘Demings’ System of Profound Knowledge’.

9. Crazy Times

Will history look on Tom Peters with the respect that it holds for Drucker and Deming?  Who knows?  But without a doubt, Peters has been influential, insightful and provocative for thirty years or more, and I am sure many of his ideas will survive.  In ‘Crazy Times Again’, I drew a line from FW Taylor (father of ‘Scientific Management’) to Peters.

10. The Circle Chart

In ‘Going Round in Circles’ I returned to management models and one of my all time favourites: Fisher and Ury’s Circle Chart. I applied it to problem solving rather than, as they did, to negotiation.

Fisher and Ury are experts on conflict resolution, as is Morton Deutsch. In ‘Conflict: As simple as AEIOU’, I looked at a fabulously simple conflict resolution model that originated in Deutsch’s International Centre for Cooperation and Conflict Resolution.

11. Two Notable Events

Two notable events made the autumn memorable for Pocketblog: one sad and one happy.

  1. In ‘A Bigger Bite’ we marked Steve Jobs’ passing
  2. With ‘Three ways to get it wrong’, we marked our hundredth blog, by looking at one of the towering social psychologists of today, Daniel Kahneman

12. And finally, our most popular topic

Tuckman’s model for group formation has proved to be our most popular topic by far this year.  We have returned to it three times, each time looking at a particular facet:

  1. ‘Swift Trust: Why some teams don’t Storm’
  2. ‘Team Performance Beyond Tuckman’
  3. ‘Tuckman Plus’ is the first of two posts.  It is the last topic post of 2011 and its companion (‘Part 2: Transforming’) will be the first of 2012

So here’s the deal

  • Have a very merry and peaceful Christmas.
  • Have a very happy and healthy New Year.
  • Be good, have fun, stay safe, and prosper.

From all at Management Pocketbooks,
our colleagues at Teacher’s Pocketbooks too,
and from me particularly.

Mike

Share this:
Posted on

Peter Drucker: Management by Objectives

Last week, we looked at the profound influence Peter Drucker had on management.  This week, let’s look at one of his biggest contributions: Management by Objectives (MBO).

Drucker’s biographer asserts that he first heard the term while studying practices at General Motors, during the Second World War.  It certainly seems like a concept that an engineer like GM’s CEO, Alfred Sloane, would have favoured.  Indeed, in more modern times, MBO has been a main stay of corporations like the much-admired Hewlett Packard.  One of its founders, Bill Packard, said of MBO:

‘No operating policy has contributed more to Hewlett-Packard’s success ‘

He went on to describe it as ‘the antithesis of management by control. The latter refers to a tightly controlled system of management of the military type [while] Management by objectives, on the other hand, refers to a system in which overall objectives are clearly stated and agreed upon, and which gives people the flexibility to work toward those goals in ways they determine best for their own areas of responsibility.’

The MBO Cycle

image

Management by Objectives is often represented as a cycle with five stages:

  1. Review the organisational context.  This is often seen as the weak point of MBO, as this is sometimes poorly understood.  Drucker, himself, has said: ‘Management by objectives works if you know the objectives: 90% of the time you don’t.’
  2. Reflect the organisation’s objectives in those you set to your team members.  Within the context of the objectives they are set, staff become self-directing, hence Packard’s distinction between MBO and control.
  3. Monitor people’s performance against the objectives you have set, and give regular, effective feedback.  Ideally, provide rapid feedback mechanisms, so that each staff member can assess their performance constantly.
  4. Assess performance against objectives, and then be sure to…
  5. Recognise and reward good performance.

‘What gets Measured, gets Managed’

This is another critique of MBO: if you measure the wrong thing, people will manage their performance to achieve it.  Drucker, as ever, was more subtle than simple descriptions of his ideas suggest and so was ahead of us here.  He noted that employees need four powers to do their jobs well:

  1. the freedom to challenge everything
  2. regular training and development
  3. the ability to achieve the objectives they are set, and see the results
  4. understanding of their organisation’s real purpose
This last means that managers and employees can set objectives that lead to the right behaviours being measured – and hence managed and delivered.

The Practice of Management

In last week’s blog, I laudedThe Practice of Management’.  It was the visionary book that kick-started the management book industry.  In it, Peter Drucker identified seven tasks for the manager of tomorrow (writing in 1954).  They all seem very much of the now, except, perhaps, one, which seems a little… pedestrian: ‘manage by objectives’.

Despite its critiques and detractors, maybe we should listen to the man who also advocated, over 50 years ago, in the same book, that we:

  • devolve risk-taking and decision-making down our organisations
  • prioritise strategic thinking
  • integrate teams of diverse members
  • motivate employees, gain their commitment and participation (‘engage’ them) with quick, clear communication
  • see your organisation as a whole
  • see your organisation and its activities in a wide perspective of society

Not a Management Pocketbook

Peter Drucker, 1909-2005I have found Robert Heller’s book on Peter Drucker to be excellent and recommend it to all Pocketblog readers.

For an introduction to Drucker’s thinking, how about The Essential Drucker, and for daily inspiration, how about The Daily Drucker?

Share this:
Posted on

Peter Drucker: The Man who Invented Management

image

Peter F Drucker is a towering figure among management thinkers.

His thinking, consulting, teaching and writing won him many accolades and his ideas have become so mainstream, that some are considered to be purely ‘received wisdom’.

.

Drucker is also paradoxical in many way, and perhaps this is why his work is so good: it remains pleasingly simple, whilst it refuses to be simplistic.

Corporate or Individual

Drucker is primarily known for his ideas about how individual managers can work best, but he made his first big mark studying a huge corporation, General Motors.  In 1942, he was invited into the company to study it and report on findings, by the Board.  His observations are captured in a business classic: ‘Concept of the Corporation’.  Ironically, the Board and its CEO, Alfred P Sloane repudiated just about all of Drucker’s findings.

Management as a Science or an Art

Drucker was influenced in his earliest thinking by ideas of ‘scientific management’, but rejected them as too rigid.  Instead, he saw management as an art – and continued to do so for all of his life.  People who met him often commented on his erudition and love of the liberal arts – he was foremost a thinker and intellectual, and a management thinker second.  It was his rejection of scientific approaches to management that caused GM to reject his findings and, many years later, in 1956, Sloane’s own book, ‘My Years with General Motors’ provided a riposte to Drucker’s.

Invention of Management

As the 1950s began, there was almost nothing written explicitly about the practice of management: what a manager should do, day-to-day, to manage. That changed in 1954, when Drucker wrote ‘The Practice of Management.’  Drucker claimed, in 1982, that, with this book, he had invented management.  Perhaps this was hyperbole, but it is fair to suggest that he did invent the management book.  Arguably, without Drucker, no Management Pocketbooks.

To the response, without Drucker, someone else would have come along, the only answer is to acknowledge the truth of this but note that we still revere other innovators like Newton, Darwin, Edison – even though each had competitors doing much the same, at around the same time.

What is in ‘The Practice of Management’?

Using case studies from organisations like IBM, Sears and Ford, Drucker lays out the basics of a fundamental management curriculum:

  • What is management?
  • How to manage staff
  • How to manage a business
  • How to manage managers
  • How to structure management

It is hard to believe that some of his themes are over 50 years old – they remain fresh and relevant today.  the need for managers to:

  • make strategic decisions
  • take risks
  • build integrated teams
  • communicate information effectively
  • see their business in the context of its ecosystem

Drucker’s Influence

Drucker’s influence is huge: ‘The Practice of Management’ sets out for the first time, Management by Objectives, and not as a fluffy catch phrase, but as a robustly developed set of ideas and processes – perhaps his last nod to scientific management.  Since the 50’s he has been the originator of much business thinking that has endured, and predicting the rise of the knowledge worker (that’s me) as early as 1959.

Drucker gave his name to Claremont University’s business school, where he taught for thirty years.  The Drucker Institute’s website has a lot of biographical information about Peter Drucker, and a link to an interesting blog, the Drucker Exchange.

More on Drucker…

in our companion articles:

Management Pocketbooks you Might Enjoy

Drucker’s work has infused so much management thinking, you’ll find it in many of our Pocketbooks.  Here are some you might like:

Share this: